Another Blah Apple Product

AppleTV Set Top BoxApple is slated to release their AppleTV box any day now, and I'm curious to know what kind of fanfare this item will receive.

The TiVo has been out for years.  Microsoft's Windows XP Media Center Edition has been available for years.  The incredibly versatile Cedia has been out for years.  What value will Apple bring to the table?

Personally, I don't think this will catch on as much as some media hype outlets want us to believe.  Apple is notorious for building closed systems, and not working with existing industry standards to make a truly superior product.  When the iPod was first released, it would only work on Macs.  A year later a Windows version of iTunes (the application) was released and the other 95% of all computer owners could go and buy a sleek little device for playing their digital music.  And then shortly afterwards the iTunes store was brought online, but you must have an iPod in order to make use of these services.  Heaven forbid someone owns some other music device and wants to give Apple some business on iTunes, because they won't be able to use any download.

Microsoft and Tivo have had years to get their foot into the living room.  Most of the people that have wanted to have some sort of digital device for their television have already picked up media computers and integrated them into the home networks.  These machines are customizable and run on standard equipment with easily replacable and upgradable components.  Should a video card or hard drive fail after a few years, most people could bring this in to the neighbourhood computer store or repair it themselves.  What will Apple offer?  More closed hardware that appears to be little more than an over-glorified mATX motherboard?

Apple had a hit with their iPod, I'll certainly admit that.  But their MacBook is nothing to write home about.  Their iPhone is nothing more than a Treo, CrackBerry or iPaq with a bigger video card, happier graphics and no thumb keyboard (which is the only thing I like about it).  AppleTV is just another "blah" product.

If this box is going to stand out from the rest, then it should have something truly powerful and worthwhile.  I could see this being far more desirable if it had some sort of home automation program like Lifeware.  It's built right into Media Center and can control your house lights, appliances, etc (when configured).

Unfortunately, Apple does not believe in the word "partners".  Everything they do, they do alone.  This is one of the reasons AppleTV will likely flop, and the iPhone will be exposed as a ridiculously expensive personal accessory that is not worth half it's weight in plastic.


A ZetaByte By Any Other Name Would Be Just As L33t

According to a study recently completed by research firm IDC, the amount of data stored by computers and media has reached 161 ExaBytes (161 billion GigaBytes, or 272,340,572,418 CDs).  According to this report, the world's data will soon surpass our storage capacity for the first time in history.  By the end of this year they expect 255 ExaBytes to exist despite our theoretical global capacity of 246 ExaBytes.

Words cannot describe how vast this amount of binary data is.

If that's not enough, we can expect the world's data to increase by a factor of six over the next three years.  As a software developer and database engineer, this is absolutely incredible.  I am curious to know just how much of this information is "unique data", though.

In the world of peer-to-peer downloading, a single 200 MegaByte episode of some TV program could be found on 50,000 computers.  That single file would be using 1,000,000 MegaBytes of storage across all the machines.  Of course some of these files could be stored on CD or DVD (or any number of other storage mediums), but it is still a massive amount of duplication.  Corporations make backups of their databases on a nightly (at the very least, I hope) basis, and these archives can easily reach tens of TeraBytes (1 million MegaBytes) of storage in the span of anywhere from a week to a year.

Of course this does raise a question ... how long until we stop being so wasteful with our storage?

Right now, storage is cheap.  I happened to see a 320 GigaByte hard drive on sale for $99 CDN at a local computer retailer, and recordable DVDs are also very inexpensive and superb for longer-term storage.  Personally I have almost 3 TeraBytes of storage on my network and archived DVDs.  Much of this data is stored in several other places on the planet.

So this makes me wonder about the potential of some centralized storage area that everyone has access to.  Of course, the word that comes to mind is "Google", but I really hope this is not the company to take over the world's data.  There are several constraints to having a central globalised data storage system, of course.  Bandwidth would certainly be a problem, as would copyright restrictions.  Lord knows that quite a bit of the 161 ExaBytes of data is pirated material.

For the moment, I don't think we'll see such a rise of global centralized storage, though.  But home network storage systems are starting to catch on, and this is a great tool for households and communities to share common data.  Transmitting something over a personal network is a heck of a lot better than downloading the same information to several computers.

By 2010, IDC expects the world's data to reach a ZetaByte.  I hope to reach 6 TeraBytes before then.

No Sleep Tonight ... Thanks National Geographic

Insects are fascinating.  These creatures are able to withstand abuses that would kill an ordinary human, and can adapt to circumstances faster than many species in other classes.  They've been on the Earth millions of years before the first humans emerged from the jungles of Africa, and will likely be on the Earth millions of years after we leave.

Vespa MandariniaTonight I decided to watch a documentary produced by National Geographic called "Insect Wars".  As the name suggests, the topic discussed was how different insect species around the world go to war for their various purposes.  One of the species covered made my skin crawl like no other ... the Vespa mandarinia (Asian Giant Hornet).

Normally I do not have a problem with insects.  Spiders the size of my thumb can be crawling on my leg and I'll calmly knock them away.  Bees can be probing my skin looking for some form of sucrose and I will not break a sweat.

Giant hornets, however, are a different matter.

Several years ago I had seen one of these while on a trip to the Royal Ontario Museum in Toronto.  Luckily, it was dead and in a glass box with several other sub-species of the Vespidae family.  These things were massive in comparison to any flying insect I had seen up until that time.  The closest thing Canada has to offer in this size category for "flying things" is a bird.  While Wiki says that these hornets top out at 45 mm (1.5 inches) in length, they looked twice that size in the glass case.

I was terrified enough as a youth to completely forget that these things thrive in Japan ... until National Geographic told me.  If that's not enough, roughly 40 people die each year from the stings these creatures can inflict.  Of course the people that do have a fatal reaction to the venom are highly allergic to all bee and hornet stings, but that's not the point ... it's the principle of the matter.

I hope to spend most of my adult life in Japan.  I'd love to travel all over the country and see everything with my own eyes.  It would also be incredibly satisfying to visit several of the mountain regions in China and Korea where these hornets command and conquer.  But after seeing what these things can do in high definition, I wonder if it would be better to stay in the more populated areas of these countries, or just remain in Canada.

Naturally, I say this in jest.  Avoiding a country just because of the local insect life is comical for a species that claims to be at the top of the food chain (and these bees are apparently made into a type of sashimi by some of the Japanese locals).  But that doesn't mean I'll do the same thing that this guy did.

I have great respect for all forms of life on this planet.  I'll just hope these hornets respect my personal space if we are ever in the same place at the same time.

Impressions of the D-Link DIR-625

After three days with this D-Link, I will never go back to Linksys.

I must admit that my impressions of D-Link's devices has been grossly out of line with reality.  I don't know when their quality improved to the point that it has, but it's a welcome sight after the month of horror with all those other routers.  This DIR-625 has been able to easily keep up with all the machines and user habits on my network, even during the most demanding of times.

The other day there were three people playing Rise of Nations via wireless connections against several opponents online while I was watching a rather large HDTV encoded documentary directly from the NAS.  There was never any hint of lag, or even a warning message in the system logs of the router.

I have never been able to claim this even when I was running the custom firmware on my initial WRT54G.

So far the people here have put this router to the test with excessive Torrents, intensive network gaming, streaming large videos from the NAS, and large data transfers to the very same network storage ... all at the same time.  We have not encountered one problem.  My previous devices would have been overloaded by this amount of simultaneous usage.

To anyone looking for a great wireless router with 802.11n capabilities, I strongly recommend this product.

<end sales pitch>  :wink: 

30 Countries!

Much respect to Davide Pozze and his Global Translator plugin.

With this handy little tool, this site is available in 10 languages through the Google Translation services.  While there have been a few hiccups over the last few months (includng Google's random temporary blocking of the feature), I must admit that it has helped me achieve the 30 country mark.  That is to say, that at 21:41 PST, a real user from Venezuela viewed my site.

I say a "real user" because if I were to include all the bots from the various countries around the world, I would be at 44 countries (anyone else know where Mauritius is?).

Considering how this site lacks any real focus and it's mainly just a collection of my random ideas (Dj Tiesto's latest CD, Elements of Life, is his best) and various bits of information, I never expected to have such a varied group of visitors.

I hope that I've been able to provide a little info or a slight diversion to everyone that's come, and I look forward to seeing what countries and peoples I can entertain in the coming years.

Less than Two Weeks to Shutdown Day

How many people are going to take part in "Shutdown Day" this year?

The idea behind this expiriment is to see how many of us can go without a computer for one day.  Many of us have become incredibly dependant on them, and most of us don't even realize just how much of our lives have changed because of the integrated circuit.

The site talks about just shutting our computers off for one day, and some people are taking it further.  In the forums there are participants from all over the world that will refrain from using electrical devices altogether.  Some will just stay away from computers and television.  And others say that they cannot go without their computers or electronic devices for various reasons.

Unfortunately, I'm in the latter group.

Shutdown Day is slated for March 24th, 2007.  Because this is a Saturday, many people can take part in this without their jobs interfering.  Heck, even I could get away from the computer for half the day without much trouble.  However (here comes my excuse), I use my computers for so many purposes that it would be almost impossible to go without for a single day.  In order to talk to Reiko I need my 100% computerized phone, or my 100% computer.  To read most of my books I require my HP iPaq (perhaps this is a good reason why digital books are not very popular).  To listen to music I require other electronics.  Heck, there's even a computer in my stove and fridge.

Many people have iPods, or cars manufactured with computer-controlled engines, PlayStations, Nintendo DS's, even talking teddy bears ... the list is seemingly endless.  In the last 50 years, we have successfully inserted computers into anything and everything.  So for many Westernized citizens, I don't think we could realistically go without our computers (be they PCs, or just computer-enhanced devices) for any real amount of time.

A day or two?  Sure.  Longer?  Probably not.

If Reiko and I were married and living together, then it wouldn't be as hard to go without touching my notebook (or any PC/Mac) for a whole weekend.  If we were on vacation somewhere, then I could even get a film-based camera and leave my trusty Canon A540 at home.  These would not be huge stretches.

But unfortunately, until that day comes, I need my computers.

Holding Out Hope for D-Link

Over the last few weeks I've written some posts about the troubles that I've been having with various Linksys routers, and today was the day that I officially removed all Linksys devices from my network.  Over the last few years I have sworn by this company, having had problems with some of the other competitors out there.  There have been print servers, NAS devices, wireless routers, firewalls, and repeaters on my home network since 1999, and I have aimed to ensure that everything was always manufactured by Linksys because of the quality and ease of use each hardware device had.  I know that there are better devices out there, but the consumer line of devices made by this company has typically been above the competition.

Until recently, that is.

In previous posts, I've ranted about problems with the WRT54GS (version 6) and the WRT300N (version 1).  I've been through two of the GS models and a 300N in the last 4 weeks.  The last solid device, a WRT54G (version 3) gave some very good performance with the factory firmware, followed by superb performance with Sveasoft's Alchemy.  Unfortunately, that device's LAN ports died, which prompted the replacement.

To summarize the failures of the Linksys devices, both the WRT54GS routers would consistently drop a network connection.  It did not matter if the computer was running wired or wireless, the connection would often drop every 20 minutes to an hour.  When running more than a single torrent, the router would often kick the offending computer offline.  At first, I had thought this was a network driver problem on my PC (my notebook has a known issue with older drivers and WinXP SP2), but this was not the case.  When running Slackware, WinXP Pro SP2, or Sun's Solaris, I could never remain on the network for more than a day.

To say this was infuriating would be an understatement.

The WRT300N was a little better, in that I could allocate DHCP addresses (which is pretty important to me).  This device gave superb wireless transmissions when it wanted to work, and would let me run up to four torrents simultaneously before succumbing to some dumb failure.  I did attempt to use the Sveasoft Talisman/Basic firmware to correct the matter, but unfortunately, this does not seem to be ready for full-time use.  The install went perfect, however, configurations would often be incredibly difficult to implement.  I would often be greeted with a blank screen after trying to make changes, and found that my requests would never be executed before the white screen.  To that end, I re-installed the factory firmware and prepped the device for a return to the store.

So, throwing caution to the wind, I decided to give D-Link a try again.  I have worked with these on several occasions in the past, but never on my own network.  In the past I had found the web UI to be very weak and lacking in functionality.  Luckily, the newer routers do not have these limitations.

I picked up a DIR-625 after exchanging the WRT300N, and quickly made my way back home.  Future-proofing is always a consideration when picking up new hardware, and judging from a few review sites, this router is pretty solid for everyone.  What I didn't understand, though, was why I was having so many troubles with it after getting the unit home.

Only my notebook was plugged into the LAN port of the router when it was first powered up.  The web UI was quick and easy to understand.  I had the unit configured with my standard SSID, WEP, DHCP allocations and port accesses within the space of five minutes.  Then I plugged my router in to the WAN port and tried to configure the device for internet access.  This is when I started running in to problems.

The router picked up the DSL modem (a D-Link, no less) and was assigned the standard "unrecognized MAC IP" that Telus provides when an unregistered MAC device connects to the modem.  This usually is not a problem as this means users are automatically forwarded to the registration page when they access the internet.  Unfortunately, this didn't happen for me, and the router decided to give me a "gateway is measuring your connectivity" messages, saying that I would be directed in a moment.

This never happened.

To add insult to injury, my wired connection was being reset by the router every 60 seconds while it measured.

At one point, I had let the router try and measure my connectivity (which was nil) for half an hour while on hold with D-Link tech support.  I feel sorry for the guy that answered my call.  I did maintain civility and discussed the matter with him as politely as possible, but it was clear to him that my frustration had reached a boiling point.  After another half-hour on the phone, the issue was not resolved and I decided that enough was enough, thanked the tech for his time and ripped the power cord and CAT5 cables from the router.  I'm sure that my neighbours heard my explicit shouts as I came to terms with yet another failure in my network.

I just expect things to work.  Just because I'm a programmer working with both software and hardware doesn't mean that I want to spend my weekends at home struggling to get simple consumer-grade equipment to work in some consistent and dependable manner.

It was at this point that I called Reiko and talked with her for a bit.  I'm really lucky to have met someone like her.  It seems that whenever I'm upset, she is calm and I can relax and return to normal.  Shortly after our chat, I reconnected the router and decided to try again.

It worked.


The modem was plugged in to the router.  My notebook was plugged in to the router.  It was the exact same configuration that had been in place for the past three hours of frustration.  Only now, I could register the router (modifying it's reported MAC addy did nothing, as this was the first thing I tried).  Once this was done, the router went and talked to the D-Link servers to measure my connectivity and report back that a newer firmware was out for my model.

So it's my guess that the router was stuck in some repetitive loop because the modem said that it was connected to the internet, but Telus' MAC registration requirements were preventing the unit from talking to its home servers.  Fun?  Wow ....

Suffice to say, the unit is now up and running.  I'm able to get some great speeds from my torrents as well as the NAS.  The radio strength is superb.  And best of all, the router has some meaningful status pages.

Hopefully this unit will give me many years (at least 2, please) of solid use.

300 Lives Up to Expectations

Spartans.  Impossible odds.  Raw testosterone.  Unblocked naked breasts (female, of course).  What more could a guy want from a movie?

Since hearing about this movie, everyone has known that it would be 95% war and 5% back-story.  We were not disappointed.

Frank Miller's 5 issue graphic novel was published by Dark Horse Comics almost ten years ago, and I remember reading this shortly after moving into my first apartment.  The story line is pretty simple:  Persians approach Greece with plans of global conquest, and Sparta is but one of a few states that try and prevent it.  The movie barely strays from the original.

There's plenty of blood, dismembered body parts, CG animated enemies and sceneries, and even a few sex scenes.  While I wouldn't recommend this kind of movie for anyone that can't handle excessive death, blood and gore, this is a pretty enjoyable movie.

Rather than get into the details of the movie, I would suggest watching it.  To quote some of the reviews I've seen elsewhere; this is made of win.


Today I managed to write three posts.  This is the third, and I highly doubt I'll ever push "Publish" on the other two.

The first was my take on the current situation regarding the comments said by Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe that may or may not have been misinterpreted by the West.  The other is on the recent Discovery Channel documentary entitled "Uncovering the Tomb of Jesus".

I have very strong opinions on both subjects which have often caused quite a bit of trouble in the past.  To that end, I'm forced to censor my ideas and thoughts about the subjects.  But the purpose of a blog is to open dialogue, no?  I'm wondering if not saying something is just as bad as getting some people upset with my black-and-white ideas on the matter.

Tim Horton's $105 Million Error

It seems that Tim Horton's is making a bit of a marketing blunder with their $105 Million lawsuit against CanWest, Standard and Bill Caroll.

For anyone not familiar with this icon of Canadian Culture, Tim Horton's is a coffee company that was started by a late Buffalo Sabre player by the same name.  From their humble beginnings in Hamilton, Ontario to their current multi-national presence, this company has been synonymous with Canada and holds a very loyal customer base.

Well, it seems that Tim Horton's received some bad press when CanWest reported last November that the company had received a financial incentive from the Canadian Government to open a location in Kandahar, Afghanistan.  It was later picked up by Bill Caroll (a provokative radio show host) who tried to make this appear as some sort of grand felony.  In the time that has passed, the company has asked for the statements to be withdrawn or an apology.

Naturally, there has been no response from any party.  So, off to court!

I'm really surprised by this.  I read the papers daily (both online and various print editions) and this was just a little two-inch article buried in the back of the Business sections when the story first broke.  Aside from CanWest and Bill Caroll, nobody had a problem with it.  It was easy to forget the comment was ever made.

Heck, with the millions of dollars that the Canadian government misappropriates every month, one would think that a small amount like $4 million so that our troops can enjoy a taste of home is a small price to pay.  And why shouldn't Tim Horton's (or any other company for that matter) have a little incentive to open a shop at a Canadian military base in some war-torn nation?

However, this issue is making headlines now that this has been made into a libel suit.  With the bigger press, now the more vocal opponents of everything and everything will raise their voices against Tim Horton's saying that the company should have opened the location at their own expense.  From the comments I've been hearing already, I think that this suit will only tarnish the company's reputation with patrons.

If Tim Horton's received some sort of incentive or subsidy for opening a location in Kandahar, then clearly it's already been vetted by some of the officials in Ottawa.  Four or five million dollars is a small price to pay considering how this boosts the morale of our troops in Afghanistan.  Sure, the money came from every Canadian (approximately 17 cents from each one of us), but the benefits far outweigh the small monetary outlay.

Unfortunately, with this subject now being discussed in a larger forum, it might cost the company more than the $105 million they're trying to collect.  Every regular patron of the brand will only need to avoid Tim Horton's for about 14 cups of coffee before that same amount is lost.  Before this suit came to life, the public didn't care ... there was no need for it.  Naturally, the money doesn't quite work like that ... but it wouldn't take much for revenues to drop at all the franchises by the same amount.

It's a shame they weren't big enough to walk away.  It's one thing to defend your name ... it's another to sully it during the act of defense.

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. ...
  4. 279
  5. 280
  6. 281
  7. 282